Combined mutations of ASXL1, CBL, FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, JAK2, KRAS, NPM1, NRAS, RUNX1, TET2 and WT1 genes in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemias

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gene mutation is an important mechanism of myeloid leukemogenesis. However, the number and combination of gene mutated in myeloid malignancies is still a matter of investigation.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We searched for mutations in the <it>ASXL1, CBL, FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, JAK2, KRAS, NPM1, NRAS, RUNX1, TET2 </it>and <it>WT1 </it>genes in 65 myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) and 64 acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs) without balanced translocation or complex karyotype.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Mutations in <it>ASXL1 </it>and <it>CBL </it>were frequent in refractory anemia with excess of blasts. Mutations in <it>TET2 </it>occurred with similar frequency in MDSs and AMLs and associated equally with either <it>ASXL1 </it>or <it>NPM1 </it>mutations. Mutations of <it>RUNX1 </it>were mutually exclusive with <it>TET2 </it>and combined with <it>ASXL1 </it>but not with <it>NPM1</it>. Mutations in <it>FLT3 (</it>mutation and internal tandem duplication), <it>IDH1</it>, <it>IDH2</it>, <it>NPM1 </it>and <it>WT1 </it>occurred primarily in AMLs.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Only 14% MDSs but half AMLs had at least two mutations in the genes studied. Based on the observed combinations and exclusions we classified the 12 genes into four classes and propose a highly speculative model that at least a mutation in one of each class is necessary for developing AML with simple or normal karyotype.</p

Mutations in ASXL1 are associated with poor prognosis across the spectrum of malignant myeloid diseases

The ASXL1 gene is one of the most frequently mutated genes in malignant myeloid diseases. The ASXL1 protein belongs to protein complexes involved in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression. ASXL1 mutations are found in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). They are generally associated with signs of aggressiveness and poor clinical outcome. Because of this, a systematic determination of ASXL1 mutational status in myeloid malignancies should help in prognosis assessment

Caractérisation des leucémies aiguës promyélocytaires sans translocation t(15;17) et/ou ne répondant pas à l'acide tout-trans rétinoïque

AIX-MARSEILLE2-BU Sci.Luminy (130552106) / SudocSudocFranceF

Chromosome arm 8p and cancer: a fragile hypothesis

International audienceChromosome arm 8p is one of the most frequently altered regions in human cancers. Several potential oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes have been identified but further investigations are needed to confirm which are bona fide oncogenic targets. In cancer cells, chromosome breaks may occur at fragile sites throughout the genome. Some fragile sites lie within genes that may have a role in cancer; the best example is FHIT at 3p14, which contains the fragile site FRA3B. We have found that chromosome breaks disrupt the NRG1 gene at 8p12 in breast and pancreatic cancers. We hypothesise that alteration of the NRG1 gene could occur through breakage at a non-common fragile site

Erythroleukemia: Classification

Abstract Acute erythroid leukemia (AEL) is a rare (2%–5%) form of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Molecular alterations found in AEL resemble those of other AMLs. We report a classification of AELs in three major classes, with different prognosis and some specific features such as a tendency to mutual exclusion of mutations in epigenetic regulators and signaling genes

Alteration of cohesin genes in myeloid diseases

International audienc

Acute erythroid leukemias have a distinct molecular hierarchy from non-erythroid acute myeloid leukemias.

International audienc

Absence of R140Q mutation of isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 in gliomas and breast cancers

International audienceSomatic mutations of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-1 and IDH2 proteins have been described in gliomas. The mutations target the R132 amino acid residue and the R172 residue in IDH1 and IDH2, respectively. The same mutations were observed in acute myeloid leukemias with normal karyotype, but a new mutation in IDH2 (R140Q substitution) was detected in malignant myeloid diseases and appears to be the most frequent IDH mutation in these pathologies. To the best of our knowledge, no study thus far has reported the presence of this R140Q mutation in IDH2 in tumors of the nervous system and breast cancers. We evaluated IDH1 and IDH2 exon 4 in 48 low-grade gliomas, 58 primary glioblastomas and 94 breast cancers to evaluate the frequency of mutation and investigated the R140Q substitution in IDH2. The results were compared to our recently obtained results in hematopoietic diseases. The frequency of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in our panel of gliomas was similar to previously reported mutations. No IDH2 R140 mutation was observed. Compared to hematopoietic diseases, the IDH2 R172 mutation was also more rare and IDH1 mutations more prominent in tumors of the nervous system. No IDH1 or IDH2 mutation was detected in the 94 breast cancer samples. Thus, the IDH2 R140 mutation appears to be restricted to hematopoietic diseases

Impact of gene mutations on treatment response and prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia secondary to myeloproliferative neoplasms

International audienceAcute myeloid leukemias secondary (sAML) to myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) have variable clinical courses and outcomes, but remain almost always fatal. Large cohorts of sAML to MPN are difficult to obtain and there is very little scientific literature or prospective trials for determining robust prog-nostic markers and efficient treatments. We analyzed event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of 73 patients with MPN who progressed to sAML, based on their epidemiological characteristics , the preexisting MPN, the different treatments received, the different prognostic groups and the responses achieved according to the ELN, and their mutational status determined by next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS). For 24 patients, we were able to do a comparative NGS analysis at both MPN and sAML phase. After acute transformation EFS and OS were respectively of 2.9 months (range: 0-48.1) and 4.7 months (range: 0.1-58.8). No difference in EFS or OS regarding the previous MPN, the ELN2017 prognostic classification, the first-line therapy or the response was found. After univariate analysis, three genes, TP53, SRSF2 and TET2, impacted pejoratively sAML prognosis at sAML time. In multivariate analysis, TP53 (P 5 .0001), TET2 (P 5 .011) and SRSF2 (P 5 .018) remained independent prognostic factors. Time to sAML transformation was shorter in SRSF2-mutated patients (51.2 months, range: 14.7-98) than in SRSF2-unmutated patients (133.8 months, range: 12.6-411.2) (P < .001). Conventional clinical factors (age, karyotype, ELN2017 prognostic classification, treatments received, treatments response, Allo-SCT.. .) failed to predict the patients' outcome. Only the mutational status appeared relevant to predict patients' prognosis at sAML phase